To help students in AIBE exam preparation, it is important to understand the AIBE 19 exam 2024 landmark cases along with their judgements.
Table of Contents
AIBE 19 exam 2024 landmark cases aid in the thorough understanding of several parts of the law. It is considered to be one of the most important part of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Understanding landmark decisions not only aids in deciphering the application of legal requirements but also in honing analytical abilities for improved exam results.
AIBE XIX (19) 2024 is scheduled to be held on Dec 22, 2024. Candidates taking the AIBE exam must download their AIBE admit card 2024 by entering their e-mail or phone number and password. Here is a compiled list of AIBE 19 exam 2024 landmark cases mentioned below.
Latest: AIBE 19 Exam Day Guidelines 2024
Don't Miss: How to fill AIBE 19 OMR Sheet?
Landmark Judgements for AIBE 19 Exam 2024
The Indian Penal Code (IPC) has a wide range of rules that address a variety of criminal offense. For AIBE candidates, studying these instances is beneficial since they demonstrate the practical application of legal principles. Below mentioned is the complete list of the AIBE 19 exam 2024 landmark cases.
1. Culpable Homicide and Murder
One area that is regularly tested is the difference between murder (Section 300, IPC) and culpable homicide (Section 299, IPC). Tabulated below is the AIBE 19 exam 2024 landmark cases for culpable homicide and murder.
| Year | Case Name | Description |
| 1912 | Emperor v. Mushnooru Suryanarayana Murthy | Investigated the idea of malice transfer under Section 301 IPC. |
| 1919 | Palani Goundan v. Emperor | Discussed the difference between murder and culpable homicide, emphasizing the bodily harm and purpose under Section 299 IPC, Second. |
| 1943 | In re Thavamani | Viewed closely related stages of a transaction as components of a single act and emphasized the continuity of intention. |
| 1956 | Kapur Singh v. State of PEPSU | Examined the accused's motivation for the offense while comparing Sections 299(b) and 300(3) IPC. |
2. Principle of Mens Rea and Strict Liability
Mens rea, which translates to "the mental intent behind an act," is a key idea in criminal law. However, mens rea is not necessary for strict liability crimes to function. Below mentioned is the AIBE 19 exam 2024 landmark cases on mens rea and strict liability.
| Year | Case Name | Description |
| 1965 | State of Maharashtra v. Mayer Hans George | Created a test to evaluate whether a statute's silence on mens rea should be interpreted as implied. |
| 1989 | State of M.P. v. Narayan Singh | Outlined the four phases of an offense and made a distinction between culpable attempts and executions and non-culpable intentions and preparations. |
3. Specific Exceptions to Section 300 (IPC)
Legal interpretations heavily rely on exceptions under Section 300 IPC, such as severe and unexpected provocation. Following are the AIBE 19 exam 2024 landmark cases on exceptions under Section 300 IPC.
| Year | Case Name | Description |
| 1962 | K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra | Discussed the First Exception to Section 300 IPC, which allows provocation as a defense in culpable homicide cases. |
| 2003 | Ghapoo Yadav v. State of M.P. | Emphasized that the parties involved in a heat-of-passion killing should not have had time to calm down following a verbal fight. |
4. Kidnapping and Abduction
The motive and method of execution distinguish abduction from kidnapping (Sections 359–369, IPC). Displayed below is the AIBE 19 exam 2024 landmark cases on abduction and kidnapping.
| Year | Case Name | Description |
| 1965 | S. Varadarajan v. State of Madras | Distinguished between a minor voluntarily accompanying the accused and a minor being "taken" out of supervision. |
| 1973 | Thakorlal D. Vadgama v. State of Gujarat | discussed how compulsion renders consent void and that it must be given voluntarily, particularly in circumstances of sexual assault and kidnapping. |
5. Sexual Offences
The IPC's sexual offense laws have been defined and strengthened in large part by the judiciary. Listed below is the AIBE 19 exam 2024 landmark cases on sexual offences.
| Year | Case Name | Description |
| 1967 | State of Punjab v. Major Singh | It has been decided that offensive behaviour that violates a woman's modesty, like making unwanted physical contact, is illegal under Section 354 of the IPC. |
| 2005 | Kanwar Pal Singh Gill v. State | Defined sexually suggestive conduct committed against a woman is considered mischief under Section 354 IPC. |
6. Joint Liability and Group Liability
Whether in murder (Section 307) or suicide (Section 309) situations, the idea of attempt necessitates careful examination. Refer to the table below to know the AIBE 19 exam 2024 landmark cases on joint and group liability.
| Year | Case Name | Description |
| 1933 | Asgarali Pradhania v. Emperor | It has been established that an attempt must fail because of outside forces and that the actions must be intended to carry out the offense. |
| 1961 | Abhayanand Mishra v. State of Bihar | According to Section 511 IPC, an attempt encompasses the preparation, intent, and actions aimed at committing the offense, even if they are not the final act. |
7. Offences of Theft, Extortion, Robbery, and Dacoity
It is essential to comprehend how theft (Section 378) leads to dacoity (Section 395). Given below are the AIBE 19 exam 2024 landmark cases on theft, robbery, dacoity, and extortion.
| Year | Case Name | Description |
| 1941 | Jadunandan Singh v. Emperor | Explained that in order to be found guilty of extortion under Section 383 IPC, there must be proof of fear of harm. |
| 1963 | Pyare Lal Bhargava v. State of Rajasthan | Discussed the acceptability of retracted confessions and the necessary components of stealing under the IPC. |
8. Offences of Criminal Misappropriation, Criminal Breach of Trust, and Cheating
These offense are covered by IPC Sections 403, 405, and 415. Check out the table below to know the AIBE 19 exam 2024 landmark cases on cheating, criminal misappropriation, and criminal breach of trust.
| Year | Case Name | Description |
| 1960 | Jaikrishnadas Manohardas Desai v. State of Bombay | An important ruling on criminal breach of trust, including its components and consequences under the Indian Penal Code. |
| 1961 | Mahabir Prasad Garodia v. State of Assam | Outlined how dishonest conversion of movable property without entrustment is necessary for criminal misappropriation. |
Also Read: Important Bare Acts for AIBE (XIX) 19 Exam 2024, Study Tips
Significance of AIBE 19 Exam 2024 Landmark Cases
After knowing the complete list of AIBE 19 exam 2024 landmark cases, students must know the importance of these cases for AIBE preparation.
- Understanding the landmark cases provides a solid foundation in constitutional law, which is an important topic in the AIBE.
- Familiarity with these cases can help students solve hypothetical legal issues on the exam.
- These decisions clarify important legal issues such as maintenance, marriage legality, PIL, privacy, and gender equality for multiple-choice questions on the AIBE.
- Knowing these decisions will also give insights into how courts interpret and apply laws in real-world situations to build a practical understanding of legal principles.
Also Read: AIBE 19 XIX 2024 Constitutional Law Questions & Answers
POST YOUR COMMENT